You have to assume every person you interview has the technical skill to do the job. Once past the traditional human resources gate-keeper by the time you meet a candidate they have the skills. When assessing a hire it is not only technical skill that keys your decision, it is about integration or how they will fit in within a team and the organization’s culture. If technical skill was the key indicator of future success wouldn’t your hires all work out? Hiring is more emotional than rational.
When you interview what do you rely on to understand if the candidate can successfully integrate into your culture? If technical skill or industry experience are all it takes to succeed than highly-selective firms such as Booz Allen Hamilton and Deloitte Consulting would not find cause to invest more than $6,500 on each employee’s new hire training over their first year.*
The results of poor hiring and recruiting drag down your company and your team. A poor hire also risks your firm’s client dissatisfaction. Each hire is a face of your company and customers and stakeholders have to deal with the results of a poor fit.
Does your organization have a consistent, organization-wide recruiting strategy?
Does your organization provide interview training skills for your interviewers?
What is your on-boarding strategy to ease the integration of new employees?
How does your organization measure fit:
- GPA?
- IQ?
- Work samples?
- References?
- Interviews?
Technical skills do not correlate to an effective employee and do not lend insight into someone’s ability to work well with a team, to fit in culturally, to manage, or to lead. Technical skill is not an indication of future success, it is an indication of performing a task.
To assess someone’s potential there are at least 4 levels of fit that matter:
- person to job;
- person to team;
- person to manager; and
- person to culture
That list, like your interview and recruiting strategy, is intended to project future performance, but like all the great financial advisors tell us, “past performance is not an indication of future results”. If these assessments worked, the inference would be clear.
There are, however, indicators beyond someone’s technical skill such as Emotional Intelligence and culture that help improve the likely success for all involved. Each employee has both internal and external customers and how a candidate interacts with others, how they manage their emotions, and how they manage relationships is extremely important. Unless you willingly recruit a hermit, people rely on each other to succeed.
The competencies of how people motivate themselves and others is broadly referred to as Emotional Intelligence (EI) and EI highlights the importance of how people interact with others and perform in a team: their role, how they motivate themselves and others, and if they deliver to the organization’s goals. In a follow up post I will focus on the importance of culture in interviewing, recruiting, and on-boarding success, but this post will look at EI.
EI is the term for how you manage yourself and others and how you react and adapt to challenges through the relate to 4 competencies:
- self-awareness
- social awareness
- self-management, and
- relationship management
The picture below identifies each competence and categories of each.
A recruiting strategy linked not only to technical need, but collaboration and culture is one of the most powerful ways your organization can remain competitive, reduce costs, and deliver customer excellence. So, what is the answer what is the prescription? There is no 1 answer, there is no blanket prescription, but there are better approaches.
In my follow-up Hiring the right person is more cultural than technical I will add a 2nd component to recruiting and interviewing that identifies culture at the individual, team, and organization level. I will also provide sample questions you might add to your hiring process to gain a better sense for a candidate’s Emotional Intelligence and the culture type they are likely to succeed best within.
I’m sure you can begin to frame interview questions just on the insights above.
No doubt I got some things wrong, or left out some important ideas. Please let me know what you think and suggestions you have for me to add value.
Sources and resources:
*Successful Onboarding: Strategies to Unlock Hidden Value Within Your Organization, by Mark Stein and Lilith Christiansen



{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
this site is so good thanks toby!
Twitter: TobyElwin
October 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Writing this site has introduced me to a lot of great people. The site is a way for me to think through what I’ve seen and how I’ve developed, learned, and discovered important interactions with people and respect.
Starting out on this site I did not have such a clear perspective on how important motivation is and how thoroughly ill-prepared team members, managers, and leaders are in understanding people’s motivations.
Understanding motivation has caused me to search the writings and behavior theories and find that many of the most important writing on management behavior happened in the 40s, 50s, and 60s. It just shows how little we listen and how little new has been written that does not rely on these principle discoveries.
Glad you like what you’ve seen and I look forward to your future thoughts. When people know each other the least people learn themselves the most.